4.8 Article

Efficient Ni2Co4P3 Nanowires Catalysts Enhance Ultrahigh-Loading Lithium-Sulfur Conversion in a Microreactor-Like Battery

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201906661

关键词

catalysis; lithium-sulfur batteries; microreactors; Ni2Co4P3 nanowire arrays; polysulfide adsorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776121]
  2. Outstanding Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20160012]
  3. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0205700]
  4. National Materials Genome Project [2016YFB0700600]
  5. Jiangsu Shuanchuang Program
  6. Thousand Youth Talents Plan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-loading lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries suffer from poor electrochemical properties. Electrocatalysts can accelerate polysulfides conversion and suppress their migration to improve battery cyclability. However, catalysts for Li-S batteries usually lack a rational design. A d-band tuning strategy is reported by alloying cobalt to metal sites of Ni2P to enhance the interaction between polysulfides and catalysts. A molecular or atomic level analysis reveals that Ni2Co4P3 is able to weaken the S-S bonds and lower the activation energy of polysulfides conversion, which is confirmed with temperature-dependent experiments. Ni2Co4P3 nanowires are further fabricated on a porous nickel scaffold to unfold the catalytic activity by its large surface area. Using a simple ion-selective filtration shell, a microreactor-like S cathode (MLSC) is constructed to realize ultrahigh S loading (25 mg cm(-2)). As such, a microreactor design integrates reaction and separation in one cell and can effectively address the polysulfide issues, the MLSC cell demonstrates excellent properties of cyclability and high capacity (1223 mAh g(-1) at 0.1 C). More importantly, the catalyst's designs and microreactor strategies provide new approaches for addressing the complicated issues of Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据