4.8 Article

Electrochemically Derived Graphene-Like Carbon Film as a Superb Substrate for High-Performance Aqueous Zn-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201907120

关键词

electrochemical kinetics; first-principles calculations; high energy density; long cycle life; porous graphene-like carbon film

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202400]
  2. 111 Project [B16016]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51702096, U1705256, 51572080]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018ZD07, 2017MS021, JB2019132]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3D graphene, as a light substrate for active loadings, is essential to achieve high energy density for aqueous Zn-ion batteries, yet traditional synthesis routes are inefficient with high energy consumption. Reported here is a simplified procedure to transform the raw graphite paper directly into the graphene-like carbon film (GCF). The electrochemically derived GCF contains a 2D-3D hybrid network with interconnected graphene sheets, and offers a highly porous structure. To realize high energy density, the Na:MnO2/GCF cathode and Zn/GCF anode are fabricated by electrochemical deposition. The GCF-based Zn-ion batteries deliver a high initial discharge capacity of 381.8 mA h g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1) and a reversible capacity of 188.0 mA h g(-1) after 1000 cycles at 1000 mA g(-1). Moreover, a recorded energy density of 511.9 Wh kg(-1) is obtained at a power density of 137 W kg(-1). The electrochemical kinetics measurement reveals the high capacitive contribution of the GCF and a co-insertion/desertion mechanism of H+ and Zn2+ ions. First-principles calculations are also carried out to investigate the effect of Na+ doping on the electrochemical performance of layered delta-MnO2 cathodes. The results demonstrate the attractive potential of the GCF substrate in the application of the rechargeable batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据