4.7 Article

Intelligent collaborative patent mining using excessive topic generation

期刊

ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aei.2019.100955

关键词

Technology mining; Excessive topic generation; Industrial immersive patenting; Patent data visualization

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST-107-2221-E-007-071, -107-2410-H-009-023, -108-2811-E-007-505]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An inevitable consequence of the technology-driven economy has led to the increased importance of intellectual property protection through patents. Recent global pro-patenting shifts have further resulted in high technology overlaps. Technology components are now spread across a huge corpus of patent documents making its interpretation a knowledge-intensive engineering activity. Intelligent collaborative patent mining facilitates the integration of inputs from patented technology components held by diverse stakeholders. Topic generative models are powerful natural language tools used to decompose data corpus topics and associated word bag distributions. This research develops and validates a superior text mining methodology, called Excessive Topic Generation (ETG), as a preprocessing framework for topic analysis and visualization. The presented ETG methodology adapts the topic generation characteristics from Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) with added capability to generate word distance relationships among key terms. The novel ETG approach is used as the core process for intelligent collaborative patent mining. A case study of 741 global Industrial Immersive Technology (ITT) patents covering inventive and novel concepts of Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Brain Machine Interface (BMI) are systematically processed and analyzed using the proposed methodology. Based on the discovered topics of the IIT patents, patent classification (IPC/CPC) predictions are analyzed to validate the superior ETG results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据