4.7 Article

Effective cluster interactions and pre-precipitate morphology in binary Al-based alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 70-84

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.011

关键词

Aluminium-based alloys; Guinier-Preston zones; Ab initio based modeling

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00366]
  2. Kempe Foundation
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. Vinnova Competence Centre Hero-m 2i - Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova) [2016-00668]
  5. Swedish industry
  6. KTH Royal Institute of Technology
  7. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00366] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  8. Vinnova [2016-00668] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The strengthening by coherent, nano-sized particles of metastable phases (pre-precipitates) continues to be the main design principle for new high-performance aluminium alloys. To describe the formation of such pre-precipitates in Al-Cu, Al-Mg, Al-Zn, and Al-Si alloys, we carry out cluster expansions of ab initio calculated energies for supercell models of the dilute binary Al-rich solid solutions. Effective cluster interactions, including many-body terms and strain-induced contributions due to the lattice relaxations around solute atoms, are thus systematically derived. Monte Carlo and statistical kinetic theory simulations, parameterized with the obtained effective cluster interactions, are then performed to study the early stages of decomposition in the binary Al-based solid solutions. We show that this systematic approach to multi-scale modelling is capable of incorporating the essential physical contributions (usually referred to as atomic size and electronic structure factors) to the free energy, and is therefore able to correctly describe the ordering temperatures, atomic structures, and morphologies of pre-precipitates in the four studied alloy systems. (C) 2019 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据