4.5 Article

Food neophobia and pickiness among children and associations with socioenvironmental and cognitive factors

期刊

APPETITE
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104373

关键词

Picky eating; Neophobia; Children; Eating behavior; Child nutrition; Child feeding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food neophobia and picky eating are common behaviors exhibited among children that may impact their nutritional health. Due to the limited data available regarding food neophobia and pickiness in Saudi Arabia, this study aimed to estimate the prevalence of picky eating and food neophobia among Saudi children and to examine the association of socioenvironmental and cognitive factors with food neophobia and pickiness. The study included 216 healthy children with no known allergy, aged 3-7 years old, recruited from six schools in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire was utilized to collect sociodemographic information from parents. Food neophobia and pickiness were evaluated using 2 separate scales. Socioenvironmental factors that may contribute to the development of food neophobia and pickiness were evaluated, such as breastfeeding duration and weaning practices, parental strategies, peer modeling, and social facilitation. Sensory sensitivity and disgust were also evaluated to assess the association with cognitive factors. Linear regression analysis with 95% confidence intervals was used to test the associations with the selected socioenvironmental and cognitive factors. The majority of children showed moderate to severe food neophobia and pickiness (98.6% and 89.8%, respectively). The socioenvironmental factors of peer modeling and selected parental strategies were found to have a significant association with food neophobia and pickiness. Assessed cognitive factors were found to be associated with food neophobia and pickiness. Future studies investigating causes of food neophobia and food pickiness among children are warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据