4.8 Article

General, Vertical, Three-Dimensional Printing of Two-Dimensional Materials with Multiscale Alignment

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 12653-12661

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b04202

关键词

3D vertical printing; 2D materials; boron nitride; alignment; thermal management

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Program (ONR YIP)
  2. Maryland Nanocenter, its Surface Analysis Center
  3. Maryland Nanocenter, its AIM Lab
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CBET 1706777]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) materials (e.g., boron nitride (BN), graphene, and MoS2) have great potential in emerging energy, environmental, and electronics applications. Assembly of 2D materials into vertically aligned structures is highly desirable (e.g., low tortuosity for rapid ion transport in fast charging-discharging batteries, guiding thermal transport for efficient thermal management), yet extremely challenging due to the energetically unfavorable in processing. Herein, we reported a general three-dimensional (3D) printing method to fabricate vertically aligned 2D materials in multiscale, using BN nanosheet as the proof-of-concept. The 3D-printed macroscale rods are composed of vertically aligned BN nanosheets at the nanoscale. The formation of the hierarchical aligned structure is enabled by the optimized ink that holds a significant shear-thinning behavior and an ultrahigh storage modulus, as identified at a narrow region in the printability diagram. The resulting vertically aligned multiscale structure with 2D nanosheets demonstrated an outstanding through plane thermal conductivity, up to 5.65 W m(-1) K-1, significantly higher than the value of conventional BN based structures where the sheets are horizontally aligned. The vertical 3D printing of 2D BN nanosheets can be expanded to other 2D materials in constructing hierarchically aligned structures for a range of emerging technologies such as batteries, membranes, and structural materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据