4.8 Article

Bioinspired Mineralization under Freezing Conditions: An Approach to Fabricate Porous Carbons with Complicated Architecture and Superior K+ Storage Performance

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 11582-11592

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.9b05284

关键词

bioinspired mineralization; freezing conditions; porous carbon; potassium-ion batteries; potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitors; energy storage

资金

  1. Shandong Provincial Key RD plan, China [2017GGX20124]
  2. Public Welfare Special Program, China [2017GGX20124]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR2018MEM014]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [201861039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioinspired mineralization is a powerful method for designing and preparing nanomaterials. In this work, we developed a bioinspired mineralization approach under freezing conditions and fabricated methyl cellulose (MC)/NaHCO3 flake precursors with a sophisticated hierarchical structure. Based on this, amazing wing-like porous carbon sheets (WPCSs) assembled by numerous interconnected hollow carbon bubbles were obtained after carbonization and removal of inorganic crystals, which are seldom obtained by other artificial methods. Benefiting from their open framework, large surface area, and enlarged interlayer spacing of graphitized nanocrystallites, the obtained WPCSs exhibited an obvious boost in potassium storage performance. As an anode of potassium-ion batteries, they showed high reversible capacities of 347 mAh g(-1) at 50 mA g(-1) and 122 mAh g(-1) at 20 A g(-1) and relatively stable cyclability for 3000 cycles. The assembled WPCS//WPCS potassium-ion hybrid supercapacitor delivered a high energy density of 108 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 280 W kg(-1). Given the cost effectiveness and green process, the modified bioinspired mineralization under freezing conditions would provide a facile and green way for exploring porous carbons with controlled structures and rich multifunction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据