4.6 Review

Specific Recognition of Promoter G-Quadruplex DNAs by Small Molecule Ligands and Light-up Probes

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 2102-2114

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00475

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India (SERB) [EMR/2016/003268]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G-Quadruplexes (G4s) are four-stranded nucleic acid structures whose underlying G-rich sequences are present across the chromosome and transcriptome. These highly structured elements are known to regulate many key biological functions such as replication, transcription, translation, and genomic stability, thereby providing an additional layer of gene regulation. G4s are structurally dynamic and diverse, and they can fold into numerous topologies. They are potential targets for small molecules, which can modulate their functions. To this end, myriad classes of small molecules have been developed and studied for their ability to bind and stabilize these unique structures. Though many of them can selectively target G4s over duplex DNA, only a few of them can distinguish one G4 topology from others. Design and development of G4-specific ligands are challenging owing to the subtle structural variations among G4 structures. However, screening assays and computational methods have identified a few classes of ligands that preferentially or specifically target the G4 topology of interest over others. This review focuses on the small molecules and fluorescent probes that specifically target human promoter G4s associated with oncogenes. Targeting promoter G4s could circumvent the issues such as undruggability and development of drug resistance associated with the protein targets. The ligands discussed here highlight that development of G4-specific ligands is an achievable goal in spite of the limited structural data available. The future goal is to pursue the development of G4-specific ligands endowed with drug-like properties for G4-based therapeutics and diagnostics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据