4.8 Article

Transformation from 3D Boron Organic Polymers to 1D Nanorod Arrays: Loading Highly Dispersed Nanometal for Green Catalysis

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 11, 期 46, 页码 43214-43222

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b15395

关键词

nano-NiO; metal boron organic polymers; BOPs@Ni; 4-nitrophenol; 4-aminophenol

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042016HF1054]
  2. Wuhan University Experiment Technology Project [WHU-2016-SYJS-06]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing global demands for eco-friendly and low-cost catalysts have propelled the advent of nanosized non-noble-metal catalysts to replace traditional noble metals. In this work, ultrafine NiO nanoparticles were prepared rapidly in situ by the strategy of transforming three-dimensional (3D) metal boron organic polymers (BOPs@Ni2+) to one-dimensional (1D) boron organic polymers (BOPs@Ni) nanorod arrays at room temperature. The 3D BOPs@Ni2+ can be quickly obtained by the interaction of 4,4'-bipyridine with Ni2+ and dodecaborate (B12H122-) in an aqueous solution. When Ni2+ is converted into NiO in situ, 1D BOPs@Ni nanostructure transformation from the 3D BOPs@Ni2+ framework was achieved due to the B-H center dot center dot center dot pi interaction between B12H122- and 4,4'-bipyridine. Furthermore, BOPs@Ni exhibits high catalytic activity and rapid kinetics in the conversion of 4-nitrophenol to 4-aminophenol, and the high stability of 1D nanorod arrays guarantees the catalytic activity of BOP@Ni to barely change under recycling for at least 10 times. BOPs@Ni also exhibits good catalytic performance and high selectivity characteristics in the catalytic reduction of a series of nitrobenzene derivatives. This strategy of using BOPs@Ni2+ for loading self-supporting nanometal not only exhibits a highly efficient catalytic hydrogenation of nitrobenzene and its derivative but also provides an effective technical route for designing self-supported nanometal materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据