4.3 Article

Long-Term Outcomes with 3-Dimensional Conformal External Beam Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

期刊

PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 E128-E135

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.09.007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Long-term tumor control and cosmetic outcomes for accelerated partial breast radiation (APBI) delivered with 3-dimensional conformal external beamradiation (3D-CRT) remain limited. Weseek to address these concerns by reporting our experience of 3D-CRTAPBI with extended follow-up. Methods and Materials: All patients treated with APBI delivered with 3D-CRT from January 2006 through December 2012 at a single institution were identified. Those with more than a year of follow-up were analyzed for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), progression-free survival (PFS), cosmesis, and pain. Disease outcomes were analyzed by margin status (<2 mm, similar to 2 mm), total radiation dose prescribed, presence of invasive disease, and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2016 updated consensus groupings (suitable, cautionary, and unsuitable). Results: Two hundred ninety-three patients were identified, of whom 266 had >1 year of follow-up. Median follow-up was 87 months (range, 13-156). Of the 266, 162 (60.9%) were ASTRO suitable, 87 (32.7%) were cautionary, and 17 (6.4%) were unsuitable. Seven-year rates of IBTR and PFS were 1.8% and 95.2%, respectively. Margin status, invasive versus in situ disease, prescribed dose, and ASTRO grouping were not prognostic for either IBTR or PFS on univariate analysis. Cosmesis was good to excellent in 75.2%. Two patients (0.8%) had subsequent plastic surgery owing to poor cosmesis. Narcotic medication for treatment site pain was needed by 6 (2.3%). Conclusions: External beam APBI results in excellent long-term disease control. Good to excellent cosmetic outcomes are achieved in most patients, although increasing dose per fraction and greater percentage of irradiated breast were predictive of adverse posttreatment cosmetic outcomes. Select patients in cautionary and unsuitable consensus groupings do not appear to have inferior outcomes. (C) 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据