4.5 Article

Prediction and validation of association between microRNAs and diseases by multipath methods

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1860, 期 11, 页码 2735-2739

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2016.03.016

关键词

MicroRNA-disease association prediction; Link prediction; Multipath method; HeteSim

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61202011, 61272152, 61320106005, 91530320]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20120121120039]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Deciphering the genetic basis of human diseases is an important goal in biomedical research. There is increasing evidence suggesting that microRNAs play critical roles in many key biological processes. So the identification of microRNAs associated with disease is very important for understanding the pathogenesis of diseases. Methods: Two multipath methods are introduced to predict the associations between microRNAs and diseases based on microRNA-disease heterogeneous network. The first method, HeteSim_MultiPath (HSMP), uses the HeteSim measure to calculate the similarity between objects and combines the HeteSim scores of different paths with a constant that dampens the contributions of longer paths. The second one, HeteSim_SVM (HSSVM), uses the HeteSim measure and the machine learning method used to combine HeteSim scores instead of a constant. Results: We use the leave-one-out cross-validation to evaluate our novel methods, and find that our methods are better than other methods. We achieve an area under the ROC curve of 0.981 and 0.984 respectively. We also check the top-10 most similarity of microRNAs-diseases associations and find that our predictions are reasonable and credible. Conclusions: The encouraging results suggest that multipath methods can provide help in identifying novel microRNA-disease associations, and guide biological experiments for scientific research. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled System Genetics (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据