4.7 Article

Bioactive Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, and Sensory Analysis of Rice-Based Extruded Snacks-Like Fortified with Bean and Carob Fruit Flours

期刊

FOODS
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods8090381

关键词

legumes enrichment; galactosides; phytate; protease inhibitors; phenols

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [RTA2012-00042-C02]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (FEDER)
  3. European Social Fund (FSE)
  4. INIA [CPR2014-0068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generally, extruded gluten-free foods are mostly phytochemically deficient. In this study inositol phosphates, alpha-galactosides, lectins, protease inhibitors, and phenols, their antioxidant activity and sensorial analysis of some rice/bean/whole carob fruit flour blends were determined in unprocessed (controls) and extruded formulations. The fortification of rice-based extrudates with both legumes has a positive influence on both their bioactive compound content and their acceptability by consumers. The extruded formulations contained around twice as much (p < 0.05) total alpha-galactosides than their unprocessed counterparts. Extrusion significantly reduced the phytic acid content (10%) and significantly increased the less phosphorylated forms (16%-70%). After extrusion, the lectins and protease inhibitors were eliminated. The different phenolic compounds mostly increased (11%-36%), notably in the formulations with carob fruit. The antioxidant activity and the different groups of phenols showed a positive correlation in the extrudates. All the experimental extrudates had higher amounts of bioactive compounds than the commercial extruded rice. Considering the amount of phytochemicals determined in the novel gluten-free extrudates and the scores of sensorial analysis, formulations containing 20%-40% bean and 5% carob fruit could be adequate in promoting health-related functions, helping to increase pulse consumption, and allowing the food industry to satisfy consumers' requirement for functional foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据