期刊
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 28, 期 -, 页码 98-106出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.021
关键词
Additive manufacturing; Electron beam powder bed fusion; Ti-6Al-4V; Qualification; Microstructure; In-situ monitoring
资金
- U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office [DE-AC05-00OR22725]
- UT-Battelle, LLC
- UTORNL Governor's Chair program for Advanced Manufacturing and Senior Design Program of the Department of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering of the Tickle College of Engineering
Traditional design and qualification methodologies for parts manufactured by traditional methods are being applied to Additive Manufacturing (AM) without understanding the nuances of the machines. While mapping process variables and tracking build data is helpful, some variables such as build geometry, support structure, and part melt order have not been researched in depth. Changing these variables can result in significant variations in material properties and defect structure such that the process appears to be unreliable compared to traditional manufacturing. Therefore, this research focuses on the need to understand the effects of overlooked variables such as melt order and nested geometry on the distribution of defects and bulk material properties in Ti-6Al-4 V alloy builds manufactured using the Arcam AB (R) electron beam powder bed fusion process(1). This study collected and analyzed process log data and near infrared (NIR) images for every layer to correlate trends in porosity formation and mechanical performance. The location of pores, while naturally stochastic, is heavily influenced by the cross-sectional area as detected by NIR images and correlates with the failure sites from uniaxial testing.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据