4.8 Review

Highly loaded fiber filled polymers for material extrusion: A review of current understanding

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 30, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100810

关键词

Material extrusion; Fused filament fabrication; Highly filled polymer composites; Fiber fillers; Thermoplastic processing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review documents the current state of the art of highly filled (HF) polymer composite systems used in additive manufacturing (AM), with a core focus on short and continuous fiber filled composites for use in material extrusion (MatEx) AM. Current state of the art composite materials systems have been succesfully incorporated into the MatEx process with loading percentages up to approximately 45 vol. %. Further increasing the loading percentage would afford significant mechanical improvements that could enable structural performance, however there are currently a number of limitations that need to be addressed. Viscosity limitations associated with MatEx processing of HF composites originate from the low processing pressure inherent to filament feed MatEx processes. Restrictive hot end nozzle geometries (high volume contractions) increase required processing pressure and potential for nozzle clogging failures. The increased viscosity of the HF composite reduces interlayer contact and adhesion during the printing process, resulting in increased void spacing. Mechanical limitations of HF composites processed using MatEx are also reviewed. Flow induced fiber orientation and its influence on viscosity and mechanical anisotropy are investigated. Fiber breakage as well as strain to break limitations are reviewed. Lastly, the geometric packing limitations of fibers within a circular bound nozzle are reviewed. This review takes an in-depth look at recent advances in addressing these challenges, and discusses opportunities for realizing MatEx processing of HF composite systems with significantly improved performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据