4.6 Article

Reconfigurable open microfluidics for studying the spatiotemporal dynamics of paracrine signalling

期刊

NATURE BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
卷 3, 期 10, 页码 830-841

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-019-0421-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation grant (EFRI-MKIS)
  2. University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA014520]
  3. Research Training in Hematology T32 [NIH T32 HL07899]
  4. NIH [R01EB010039 BRG, R01 CA185251, K12 DK100022]
  5. DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program [W81XWH-16-0543]
  6. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation (Beckman Young Investigator Award)
  7. University of Washington

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study of intercellular signalling networks requires organotypic microscale systems that facilitate the culture, conditioning and manipulation of cells. Here, we describe a reconfigurable microfluidic cell-culture system that facilitates the assembly of three-dimensional tissue models by stacking layers that contain preconditioned microenvironments. By using principles of open and suspended microfluidics, the Stacks system is easily assembled or disassembled to provide spatial and temporal manoeuvrability in two-dimensional and three-dimensional assays of multiple cell types, enabling the modelling of sequential paracrine-signalling events, such as tumour-cell-mediated differentiation of macrophages and macrophage-facilitated angiogenesis. We used Stacks to recapitulate the in vivo observation that different prostate cancer tissues polarize macrophages with distinct gene-expression profiles of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Stacks also enabled us to show that these two types of macrophages signal distinctly to endothelial cells, leading to blood vessels with different morphologies. Our proof-of-concept experiments exemplify how Stacks can efficiently model multicellular interactions and highlight the importance of spatiotemporal specificity in intercellular signalling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据