4.5 Article

Quantification of cell membrane permeability induced by monopolar and high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1858, 期 11, 页码 2689-2698

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.06.024

关键词

Electroporation; Bipolar electrical pulses; Permeability; Irreversible electroporation; Gene electrotransfer; Electrochemotherapy

资金

  1. Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) [BI-US/14-15-016]
  2. COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-frequency bipolar electric pulses have been shown to mitigate undesirable muscle contraction during irreversible electroporation (IRE) therapy. Here, we evaluate the potential applicability of such pulses for introducing exogenous molecules into cells, such as in electrochemotherapy (ECT). For this purpose we develop a method for calculating the time course of the effective permeability of an electroporated cell membrane based on real-time imaging of propidium transport into single cells that allows a quantitative comparison between different pulsing schemes. We calculate the effective permeability for several pulsed electric field treatments including trains of 100 mu s monopolar pulses, conventionally used in IRE and ECT, and pulse trains containing bursts or evenly spaced 1 mu s bipolar pulses. We show that shorter bipolar pulses induce lower effective membrane permeability than longer monopolar pulses with equivalent treatment times. This lower efficiency can be attributed to incomplete membrane charging. Nevertheless, bipolar pulses could be used for increasing the uptake of small molecules into cells more symmetrically, but at the expense of higher applied voltages. These data indicate that high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses may be designed to electroporate cells as effectively as and more homogeneously than conventional monopolar pulses. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据