4.7 Article

The First Identification and Antibiogram of Clostridium perfringens Type C Isolated from Soil and The Feces of Dead Foals in South Korea

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani9080579

关键词

Clostridium perfringens; beta-toxin; 16S rRNA; antibiotic; South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simple Summary Clostridium (C.) perfringens in horses causes acute enteritis and death, but research on C. perfringens in South Korea is virtually nonexistent. The purpose of this study was to discover the cause of death of numerous South Korean foals. C. perfringens was isolated from 25 (11.1%) of 225 sampled horses and from 16 (35.56%) of 45 farms investigated in this study. Of the 25 C. perfringens isolates, 15 (60%) were type A and 10 (40%) were type C. Type C was observed on all the farms where the foals' deaths occurred. The antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed using MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) Evaluator strips test. These results are the first to identify one of the causes of acute foal death in South Korea and can be used as a criterion to determine the cause of acute foal death and to select effective antibiotics. Clostridium (C.) perfringens was isolated from 25 (11.1%) of 225 sampled horses and from 16 (35.56%) of 45 farms. All of the samples were negative for cpe, etx, itx, NetF genes and cpa gene were detected in 100% (25 of 25) of the samples that were positive for C. perfringens. cpb and cpb2 were detected in 40.0% (10 of 25) and 60.0% (15 of 25) of the samples that were positive for C. perfringens, respectively. Of the 25 C. perfringens isolates, 15 (60%) were type A and 10 (40%) were type C. Type C was observed on all the farms where the foals' deaths occurred. None of the isolates were positive for type B, type D, or type E. The MIC Evaluator strips antimicrobial susceptibility test showed meropenem (96%), ampicillin (92%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (84%), and tetracycline (8%) sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据