4.6 Review

Alzheimer's Disease Research Using Human Microglia

期刊

CELLS
卷 8, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells8080838

关键词

neuroinflammation; microglia; cell culture; brain; amyloid; neurodegeneration; autopsy

资金

  1. Arizona State DHS grant [ADHS-14-052688]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [U24 NS072026]
  3. National Institute on Aging [P30 AG19610]
  4. Arizona Department of Health Services [211002]
  5. Arizona Biomedical Research Commission [4001, 0011, 05-901, 1001]
  6. Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
  7. Sun Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental studies of neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD) have mostly investigated microglia, the brain-resident macrophages. This review focused on human microglia obtained at rapid autopsies. Studies employing methods to isolate and culture human brain microglia in high purity for experimental studies were discussed. These methods were employed to isolate human microglia for investigation of a number of features of neuroinflammation, including activation phenotypes, neurotoxicity, responses to abnormal aggregated proteins such as amyloid beta, phagocytosis, and the effects of aging and disease on microglia cellular properties. In recent years, interest in human microglia and neuroinflammation has been renewed due to the identification of inflammation-related AD genetic risk factors, in particular the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (TREM)-2. Because of the difficulties in developing effective treatments for AD, there has been a general need for greater understanding of the functions of microglia in normal and AD brains. While most experimental studies on neuroinflammation have employed rodent microglia, this review considered the role of human microglia in experimental studies. This review focused on the development of in vitro methodology for the culture of postmortem human microglia and the key findings obtained from experimental studies with these cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据