4.7 Article

Class I histone deacetylase inhibition is synthetic lethal with BRCA1 deficiency in breast cancer cells

期刊

ACTA PHARMACEUTICA SINICA B
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 615-627

出版社

INST MATERIA MEDICA, CHINESE ACAD MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.08.008

关键词

BRCA1; Histone deacetylase; HDAC; Synthetic lethality; Reactive oxygen species; DNA damage; Breast cancer

资金

  1. Information and Communication Technology Office (ICTO) of the University of Macau, China
  2. University of Macau, China [MYRG2017-00176-FHS]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) is a tumor suppressor gene, which is frequently mutated in breast and ovarian cancers. BRCA1 plays a key role in the homologous recombination directed DNA repair, allowing its deficiency to act as a therapeutic target of DNA damaging agents. In this study, we found that inhibition of the class I histone deacetylases (HDAC) exhibited synthetic lethality with BRCA1 deficiency in breast cancer cells. Transcriptome profiling and validation study showed that HDAC inhibition enhanced the expression of thioredoxin interaction protein (TXNIP), causing reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated DNA damage. This effect induced preferential apoptosis in BRCA1(-/- )breast cancer cells where DNA repair system is compromised. Two animal experiments and gene expression-associated patients' survival analysis further confirmed in vivo synthetic lethality between BRCA1 and HDAC. Finally, the combination of inhibitors of HDAC and bromodomain and extra-terminal motif (BET), another BRCA1 synthetic lethality target that also works through oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage, showed a strong anticancer effect inBRCA1(-/-) breast cancer cells. Together, this study provides a new therapeutic strategy for BRCA1-deficient breast cancer by targeting two epigenetic machineries, HDAC and BET. (C) 2020 Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据