4.8 Article

Mitigation efforts will not fully alleviate the increase in water scarcity occurrence probability in wheat-producing areas

期刊

SCIENCE ADVANCES
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aau2406

关键词

-

资金

  1. SustES - Adaptation strategies for sustainable ecosystem services and food security under adverse environmental conditions [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000797]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0606404]
  3. Innovation Fund Denmark
  4. SPACES program of the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01LL1304A]
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Designing Future Wheat Programme [BB/P016855/1]
  6. Spanish National Institute for Agricultural and Food Research and Technology
  7. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [MACSUR02-APCIN2016-00050-00-00]
  8. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through MACSUR2 [031B0039C]
  9. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0220] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Global warming is expected to increase the frequency and intensity of severe water scarcity (SWS) events, which negatively affect rain-fed crops such as wheat, a key source of calories and protein for humans. Here, we develop a method to simultaneously quantify SWS over the world's entire wheat-growing area and calculate the probabilities of multiple/sequential SWS events for baseline and future climates. Our projections show that, without climate change mitigation (representative concentration pathway 8.5), up to 60% of the current wheat-growing area will face simultaneous SWS events by the end of this century, compared to 15% today. Climate change stabilization in line with the Paris Agreement would substantially reduce the negative effects, but they would still double between 2041 and 2070 compared to current conditions. Future assessments of production shocks in food security should explicitly include the risk of severe, prolonged, and near- simultaneous droughts across key world wheat-producing areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据