4.4 Article

The experiment research and engineering verification on the synergistic lubrication properties of silver and multiwalled carbon nanotubes

期刊

ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1687814019879799

关键词

Metal-matrix composites; wear; micro-mechanics

资金

  1. Tribology Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tribology [SKLTKF18B09]
  2. Talent Introduction Project of Sichuan University of Science Engineering [2016RCL04]
  3. Doctoral Start-up Funding of Anyang Institute of Technology [BSJ2018005]
  4. Foundation of Henan Educational Committee [19A460011]
  5. Project for Science and Technology Plan of Henan Province [192102210010]
  6. Science Research Project in Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region for Institution of Higher Learning [NJZZ16369]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A synergistic lubrication of silver and multiwalled carbon nanotubes was studied to minimize friction and decrease wear in the rotating mechanical components. Samples of TiAl alloy (TA), TiAl-10 wt% Ag (TAA), and TiAl-10 wt% Ag-1.0 wt% multiwalled carbon nanotubes (TAAM) were prepared using spark plasma sintering. The method of experimental test and engineered verification was used to explore the synergistic lubrication of silver and multiwalled carbon nanotubes in the TAAM sliding against Si3N4 balls on the ball-on-disk tribometer of No. HT-1000. The results showed that the friction and wear behavior of the TAA was more excellent than that of a TA. The TAAM obtained the smaller friction coefficient and wear rate in comparison to the TAA. The multiwalled carbon nanotubes were pulled out of the TAAM during sliding, were exposed on a wear scar, and were tightly combined with the silver to form a lubrication film. The lubrication film with silver and multiwalled carbon nanotubes resulted in an excellent friction reduction and wear-resistant property, and it caused the TAAM to obtain smaller friction and lower wear than those of the TA and TAA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据