4.2 Article

Highly tuned cobalt-doped MnO2 nanozyme as remarkably efficient uricase mimic

期刊

APPLIED NANOSCIENCE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 317-328

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-019-01118-x

关键词

Nanozyme; Oxidase; Uric acid; Uricase; Nano-catalysis; Manganese dioxide; Singlet oxygen

资金

  1. UGC, New Delhi
  2. DST, New Delhi [SR/FT/CS-006/2010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gouty arthritis is a commonly occurring metabolic disorder in adult humans. It is caused by accumulation of uric acid (UA) in the joints owing to lack of any enzyme like uricase, which can metabolise excess UA in the human body. In this work, we propose a solution for the same. After testing the oxidase-like activity of Co-doped MnO2 using 3,3 ',5,5 '-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), as less as 50 mu g mL(-1) of this catalyst was found to readily oxidise and completely degrade a 50 mu M uric acid solution at 37 degrees C within 4 h (pH 7.4). The rate of the reaction found to be 1.208 x 10(-4) s(-1) at this temperature. The result clearly indicates better activity of these nanoparticles over bacterial uricase enzyme as the activation energy of the reaction decreased from the reported value of 53 to 43 kJ mol(-1) in this work. This is by far the lowest reported E-act by any enzyme mimic for uricase. Composed of two bio-relevant metals namely Mn and Co, the nanozyme is economical as well as safe to use for treatment of gout. The nanozyme could be successfully recycled four times with no loss in the oxidase-like activity and proved to be quite stable in the employed conditions as the metal content and morphology were retained even after reuse. Generation of in situ singlet oxygen/superperoxide radical-type species was another striking feature of the employed nanozyme. LC-MS data of the degraded products further gave insights on the pathway followed for degradation over the nanozyme. Overall, a bio-relevant as well as cost effective alternate for the treatment of gout envisaged in the current study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据