4.7 Article

ITSG-Grace2018: Overview and Evaluation of a New GRACE-Only Gravity Field Time Series

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH
卷 124, 期 8, 页码 9332-9344

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019JB017415

关键词

GRACE; monthly solutions; intercomparison

资金

  1. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [859736]
  2. NAWI Graz
  3. TU Graz Open Access Publishing Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ITSG-Grace2018 is a new series of GRACE-only gravity field solutions based on reprocessed GRACE observation data (L1B RL03) and the latest atmosphere and ocean dealiasing product (AOD1B RL06). It includes unconstrained monthly and constrained daily solutions, as well as a high-resolution static gravity field. Compared to the previous ITSG release, we implemented a number of improvements within the processing chain and use updated background models. In an effort to better model all known error sources, we propagate synthetic orientation uncertainties of the star camera assembly to the antenna offset correction for intersatellite ranging observations. This enables the disentanglement of the stationary noise of the K-Band system and the nonstationary noise of the antenna offset correction. We further incorporated uncertainties of the atmosphere and ocean dealiasing product to reduce temporal aliasing effects. To mitigate errors in the applied ocean tide model, we used constrained GRACE estimates of selected tidal constituents as an additional background model. Variability over quiet ocean areas suggests a 27% to 46% lower noise level compared to the current spherical harmonic solutions of the official processing centers (300 km Gaussian filter applied). To ensure that the low noise floor is not accompanied by signal loss, we examined drainage basin averages, which showed consistent amplitudes with the official GRACE time series. These evaluations lead to the conclusion that ITSG-Grace2018 is a state-of-the-art GRACE time series which exhibits an excellent signal-to-noise ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据