4.7 Article

The influence of the austenite grain size on the microstructural development during quenching and partitioning processing of a low-carbon steel

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.107847

关键词

Prior austenite grain size; Microstructural design; Martensite; Retained austenite; Carbon partitioning; Quenching & Partitioning

资金

  1. Research Fund for Coaland Steel [RFCS-02-2015, 709755]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of the prior austenite grain size (PAGS), varying between 6 and 185 mu m, on the microstructural development of a low carbon steel during quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processing is investigated. The effect on the size and morphological aspects of the microconstituents is discussed based on the kinetics of carbon redistribution between martensite and austenite upon partitioning conditions of 400 degrees C and 50 s. Under fixed quenching and partitioning conditions, decreasing the PAGS leads to a more efficient carbon partitioning process through the smaller and more homogeneously distributed phases developed during the first quench. In contrast, the microstructural heterogeneity obtained with larger PAGSs makes it more difficult to control the degree of carbon enrichment in austenite during partitioning and thus the austenite stability. Additionally, large volumes of fresh martensite are more likely to form in the interior of large-scale austenite grains due to the incomplete carbon homogenisation process. To consider the PAGS in the design of Q&P microstructures the selection of an optimum fraction of primary martensite is proposed, which ensures the minimisation of fresh martensite in the final microstructure and the sufficient stabilisation of the austenite phase. This new methodology facilitates the applicability of the Q&P process providing a controlled and reproducible development of optimised Q&P microstructures. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据