4.7 Article

BigSMILES: A Structurally-Based Line Notation for Describing Macromolecules

期刊

ACS CENTRAL SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 1523-1531

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00476

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for the Chemistry of Molecularly Optimized Networks
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for Chemical Innovation [CHE-1832256]
  3. Furukawa Electric Co. Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Having a compact yet robust structurally based identifier or representation system is a key enabling factor for efficient sharing and dissemination of research results within the chemistry community, and such systems lay down the essential foundations for future informatics and data-driven research. While substantial advances have been made for small molecules, the polymer community has struggled in coming up with an efficient representation system. This is because, unlike other disciplines in chemistry, the basic premise that each distinct chemical species corresponds to a well-defined chemical structure does not hold for polymers. Polymers are intrinsically stochastic molecules that are often ensembles with a distribution of chemical structures. This difficulty limits the applicability of all deterministic representations developed for small molecules. In this work, a new representation system that is capable of handling the stochastic nature of polymers is proposed. The new system is based on the popular simplified molecular-input line-entry system (SMILES), and it aims to provide representations that can be used as indexing identifiers for entries in polymer databases. As a pilot test, the entries of the standard data set of the glass transition temperature of linear polymers (Bicerano, 2002) were converted into the new BigSMILES language. Furthermore, it is hoped that the proposed system will provide a more effective language for communication within the polymer community and increase cohesion between the researchers within the community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据