4.5 Article

A cryo-EM grid preparation device for time-resolved structural studies

期刊

IUCRJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 1024-1031

出版社

INT UNION CRYSTALLOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.1107/S2052252519011345

关键词

time-resolved cryo-EM; sample preparation; microscope hardware; structural biology; voltage-assisted spraying

资金

  1. University of Leeds
  2. Wellcome Trust [108466/Z/15/Z, 204825/Z/16/Z]
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/P026397/1]
  4. American Heart Association
  5. US National Institutes of Health [NIHR21AR-071675]
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/P018491/1]
  7. BBSRC [BB/P026397/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MR/P018491/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structural biology generally provides static snapshots of protein conformations that can provide information on the functional mechanisms of biological systems. Time-resolved structural biology provides a means to visualize, at near-atomic resolution, the dynamic conformational changes that macromolecules undergo as they function. X-ray free-electron-laser technology has provided a powerful tool to study enzyme mechanisms at atomic resolution, typically in the femtosecond to picosecond timeframe. Complementary to this, recent advances in the resolution obtainable by electron microscopy and the broad range of samples that can be studied make it ideally suited to time-resolved approaches in the microsecond to millisecond timeframe to study large loop and domain motions in biomolecules. Here we describe a cryo-EM grid preparation device that permits rapid mixing, voltage-assisted spraying and vitrification of samples. It is shown that the device produces grids of sufficient ice quality to enable data collection from single grids that results in a sub-4 angstrom reconstruction. Rapid mixing can be achieved by blot-and-spray or mix-and-spray approaches with a delay of similar to 10 ms, providing greater temporal resolution than previously reported mix-and-spray approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据