4.8 Article

Immunophenotype of a Rat Model of Duchenne's Disease and Demonstration of Improved Muscle Strength After Anti-CD45RC Antibody Treatment

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02131

关键词

Treg; tolerance; muscle injury; dystrophin; immunosuppression; knockout rats; TALEN; nucleases

资金

  1. Region Pays de la Loire
  2. TEFOR project - Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [ANRII-INSB-0014]
  3. Labex IGO project part of the Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [ANR-11-LABX-0016-01]
  4. IHU-Cesti project part of the Investissements d'Avenir French Government program [ANR-10-IBHU-005]
  5. Nantes Metropole
  6. Fondation Progreffe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Corticosteroids (CS) are standard therapy for the treatment of Duchenne's muscular dystrophy (DMD). Even though they decrease inflammation, they have limited efficacy and are associated with significant side effects. There is therefore the need for new protolerogenic treatments to replace CS. Dystrophin-deficient rats (Dmd(mdx)) closely resemble the pathological phenotype of DMD patients. We performed the first Immunophenotyping of Dmdmdx rats and showed leukocyte infiltration in skeletal and cardiac muscles, which consisted mostly of macrophages and T cells including CD45RC(high) T cells. Muscles of DMD patients also contain elevated CD45RC(high) T cells. We treated Dmd(mdx) rats with an anti-CD45RC MAb used in previous studies to deplete CD45RChigh T cells and induce immune tolerance in models of organ transplantation. Treatment of young Dmd(mdx) rats with anti-CD45RC MAb corrected skeletal muscle strength and was associated with depletion of CD45RChigh T cells with no side effects. Treatment of young Dmd(mdx) rats with prednisolone resulted in increase in skeletal muscle strength but also severe growth retardation. In conclusion, anti-CD45RC MAb treatment has potential in the treatment of DMD and might eventually result in reduction or elimination of CS use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据