4.4 Article

Evidence of Negative Cooperativity and Half-Site Reactivity within an F420-Dependent Enzyme: Kinetic Analysis of F420H2:NADP+ Oxidoreductase

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 55, 期 7, 页码 1082-1090

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00762

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1120837, 1303803]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1120837] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Chemistry [1303803] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here, we report the very first example of half-site reactivity and negative cooperativity involving an important F-420 cofactor-dependent enzyme. F420H2:NADP(+) oxidoreductase (Fno) is an F-420 cofactor-dependent enzyme that catalyzes the reversible reduction of NADP(+) through the transfer of a hydride from the reduced F-420 cofactor. These catalytic processes are of major significance in numerous biochemical processes. While the steady-state kinetic analysis showed classic Michaelis-Menten kinetics with varying concentrations of the F-420 redox moiety, FO, such plots revealed non-Michaelis-Menten kinetic behavior when NADPH was varied. The double reciprocal plot of the varying concentrations of NADPH displays a downward concave shape, suggesting that negative cooperativity occurs between the two identical monomers. The transient state kinetic data show a burst prior to entering steady-state turnover. The burst suggests that product release is rate limiting, and the amplitude of the burst phase corresponds to production of product in only one of the active sites of the functional dimer. These results suggest either half-site reactivity or an alternate sites model wherein the reduction of the cofactor, FO occurs at one active site at a time followed by reduction at the second active site. Thus, the data imply that Fno may be a functional regulatory enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据