4.3 Review

Canine vector-borne disease: mapping and the accuracy of forecasting using big data from the veterinary community

期刊

ANIMAL HEALTH RESEARCH REVIEWS
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 47-60

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1466252319000045

关键词

Anaplasma; canine vector-borne disease; Ehrlichia; epidemiology; forecast; heartworm; Lyme; One Health

资金

  1. Companion Animal Parasite Council
  2. National Science Foundation [DMS 1407480, OIA-1826715]
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica-CAPC Infectious Disease Postdoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of vector-borne disease (VBD in pets is one cornerstone of companion animal practices. Veterinarians are facing new challenges associated with the emergence, reemergence, and rising incidence of VBD, including heartworm disease, Lyme disease, anaplasmosis, and ehrlichiosis. Increases in the observed prevalence of these diseases have been attributed to a multitude of factors, including diagnostic tests with improved sensitivity, expanded annual testing practices, dimatologic and ecological changes enhancing vector survival and expansion, emergence or recognition of novel pathogens, and increased movement of pets as travel companions. Veterinarians have the additional responsibility of providing information about zoonotic pathogen transmission from pets, especially to vulnerable human populations: the immunocompromised, children, and the elderly. Hindering efforts to protect pets and people is the dynamic and ever-changing nature of VBD prevalence and distribution. To address this deficit in understanding, the Companion Animal Parasite Council (CAPC) began efforts to annually forecast VBD prevalence in 2011. These forecasts provide veterinarians and pet owners with expected disease prevalence in advance of potential changes. This review summarizes the fidelity of VBD forecasts and illustrates the practical use of CAPC pathogen prevalence maps and forecast data in the practice of veterinary medicine and client education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据