4.6 Article

On the Origin of the Large Remanent Polarization in La:HfO2

期刊

ADVANCED ELECTRONIC MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201900303

关键词

ferroelectrics; HfO2; stress; texture; XRD

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) [MI 1247/11-2]
  2. Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg via the project CO-FERMAT [FNR/P12/4853155/Kreisel]
  3. Oak Ridge National Laboratory by the DOE Office of Science User Facilities
  4. Humboldt postdoctoral fellowship from Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  5. EFRE fund of the European Commission
  6. Free State of Saxony (Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outstanding remanent polarization of 40 mu C cm(-2) reported for a 10 nm thin La:HfO2 film in 2013 has attracted much attention. However, up to now, no explanation for this large remanent polarization has been presented. Density functional theory and X-ray diffraction are used to shine light onto three major aspects that impact the macroscopically observed remanent polarization: phase fraction, spontaneous polarization, and crystallographic texture. Density functional theory calculations show that the spontaneous polarization (P-s) of La:HfO2 is indeed a bit larger than for other HfO2- or ZrO2-based compounds; however, the P-s is not large enough to explain the observed differences in remanent polarization. While neither phase fractions nor spontaneous polarization nor strain are significantly different from those in other HfO2 films, a prominent 020/002 texture distinguishes La doped from other HfO2-based ferroelectric films. Angular-dependent diffraction data provide a pathway to calculate the theoretically expected remanent polarization, which is in agreement with the experimental observations. Finally, an interplay of the in-plane strain and texture is proposed to impact the formation of the ferroelectric phase during annealing. Further aspects of the special role of La as a dopant are collected and discussed to motivate future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据