4.7 Article

Stability of Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Perovskite CH3NH3PbBr3 Nanocrystals under Co-Stresses of UV Light Illumination and Temperature

期刊

NANOMATERIALS
卷 9, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano9081158

关键词

perovskite nanocrystals; stability; combined stresses; electronic structure; photophysical properties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61504112, 11604285, 51605404, 11504182, 11674054]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [20720190005]
  3. Science and Technology Project of Fujian Province [2018H6022]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2018J01103]
  5. Technological Innovation Project of Economic and Information Commission of Fujian Province
  6. Strait Postdoctoral Foundation of Fujian Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid organic-inorganic metal halide perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) are among the candidates for color conversion materials in displays, especially in NC-based micro-light-emitting diode (micro-LED) displays. However, these NCs are still lacking long-term stability, which has hindered their large-scale applications. We mimic the working conditions, which include ultraviolet light illumination at 323 K and three different types of atmosphere (N-2, vacuum, and air), respectively, to investigate the stability of CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs embedded in the polyvinylidene fluoride matrix. X-ray diffraction results indicate the generation of NH4Pb2Br5, which is produced from the encapsulated CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs in all three atmospheres, and the decomposition generates a large amount of accompanying interface defects at the surface area of NCs, resulting in the significant decrease of the photoluminescence (PL) intensity. This work highlights the stability-related mechanism of CH3NH3PbBr3 NCs under combined external stresses that mimic operating conditions. In addition, this work also suggests a new method for conducting aging tests and contributes to developing effective routes towards higher stability of perovskite NCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据