4.6 Article

Classification of Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Profiles via Graph Convolutional Neural Networks

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00594

关键词

multiple sclerosis; graph neural networks; graph-derived metrics; diffusion tensor imaging; connectome

资金

  1. project Dottorato innovativo a caratterizzazione industriale PON R&I FSE-FESR 2014-2020
  2. French National Research Agency (ANR) within the national program Investissements d'Avenir through the OFSEP project [ANR-10-COHO-002]
  3. NVIDIA Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in image acquisition and processing techniques, along with the success of novel deep learning architectures, have given the opportunity to develop innovative algorithms capable to provide a better characterization of neurological related diseases. In this work, we introduce a neural network based approach to classify Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients into four clinical profiles. Starting from their structural connectivity information, obtained by diffusion tensor imaging and represented as a graph, we evaluate the classification performances using unweighted and weighted connectivity matrices. Furthermore, we investigate the role of graph-based features for a better characterization and classification of the pathology. Ninety MS patients (12 clinically isolated syndrome, 30 relapsing-remitting, 28 secondary-progressive, and 20 primary-progressive) along with 24 healthy controls, were considered in this study. This work shows the great performances achieved by neural networks methods in the classification of the clinical profiles. Furthermore, it shows local graph metrics do not improve the classification results suggesting that the latent features created by the neural network in its layers have a much important informative content. Finally, we observe that graph weights representation of brain connections preserve important information to discriminate between clinical forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据