4.3 Article

Genetic diversity and population structure of the endangered medicinal plant Phellodendron amurense in China revealed by SSR markers

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 286-292

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.04.018

关键词

Phellodendron amurense; Simple sequence repeats (SSRs); Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Conservation strategy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81441132]
  2. Specimen Platform of China
  3. Teaching Specimen's Subplatform
  4. Project of Youth Fund of Jiamusi University [Sq2013-026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phellodendron amurense is an endangered tree with important medicinal and economic value in China. In this study, eight nuclear SSR primer pairs were employed to assess the genetic diversity and structure of 22 natural populations, including 516 individuals. A total of 66 alleles were detected with an average of 8.3 alleles per locus ranging from 3 to 17. The expected heterozygosity (He) of each SSR locus varied from 0.347 to 0.877 (average 0.627). Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) revealed that the main variation component existed within populations (95.11%) rather than among populations (4.89%). The Wilcoxon's sign-rank tests did not show any recent bottleneck effect in any population. A Mantel test displayed a significant correlation between the geographic distances and genetic distances for all populations (r = 0.566, P = 0.0001), indicating conformity to the isolation by distance model. Bayesian clustering and UPGMA supported grouping the populations into two groups. The present genetic structure of P. amurense may be explained by geographical isolation. The lack of genetic structure and genetic diversity decreased with increasing latitude within the Northeast China group may be due to postglacial northward expansion from a single. refugium. Proper conservation measures are proposed for this species. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据