4.5 Article

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis

期刊

BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1382

关键词

acute ischemic stroke; hemorrhage transformation; meta-analysis; mortality; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701161, YR201802, KY24520346, KGF2019G02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been shown to be a marker associated with inflammation and is independently associated with the adverse clinical outcomes of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a serious complication of ischemic cerebral infarction and can be intensified by therapeutic interventions for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The purpose of our research was to explore the predictive effect of NLR for HT in patients with AIS and to determine the best predictive value. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were searched. The primary endpoint was HT, and subgroup analysis was performed. Review Manager software version 5.3 was used to statistically analyze the outcomes. Results A total of seven studies including 3,726 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (OR) value of the high NLR that predicted HT in AIS patients was 1.53 (95% CI, 1.21-1.92; p = .0003). In addition, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05-1.15; p < .0001) was the pooled OR of the high NLR associated with increased 3-month mortality in patients with AIS. In the subgroup analysis with an NLR cutoff value of 7.5-11, the correlation between NLR above the cutoff value and the rate of HT in patients with AIS was statistically significant (OR, 7.93; 95% CI, 2.25-27.95; p = .001). Conclusion A high NLR can predict HT and 3-month mortality in patients with AIS. Regardless of the country of origin and the sampling time, an NLR with a cutoff value of 7.5-11 was independently associated with HT in AIS patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据