4.0 Article

New virtual reality tool (Nesplora Aquarium) for assessing attention and working memory in adults: A normative study

期刊

APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 403-415

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1646745

关键词

Adults; attention; continuous performance test; diagnosis; virtual reality

资金

  1. European Commission under Horizon 2020 Program (Project VRMIND - Virtual Reality Based Evaluation of Mental Disorders) [733901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new continuous performance test tool based on virtual reality was developed to measure attention and working memory levels in adults, showing good psychometric properties in a Spanish population with regards to reliability and internal consistency.
Attentional and working memory (WM) processes undergo significant changes during different stages of development. However, currently there are not many continuous performance tools based on virtual reality (VR) for measuring attentional capacity in adults. The present study aimed to obtain normative data for the Nesplora Aquarium VR test in a Spanish population, looking at sex and age variables. In addition, this study also aimed to analyze the psychometric properties of the tool such as scale, internal consistency, and item difficulty and discrimination indices. A total of 1,469 participants from different regions of Spain (57.6% female) with ages ranging from 16 to 90 years old took part in this normative study. Nesplora Aquarium was developed in order to support clinicians in the assessment of attentional processes and WM in adults over 16 years old. It is an 18-minute individual test performed through a VR system. The system provides better visual and auditory immersion in the task than computerized CPTs. This study revealed that the new VR tool, designed to measure adult attention and working memory levels, exhibited good psychometric properties related to reliability and internal consistency. In addition, item difficulty and discrimination values were also acceptable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据