4.6 Article

Titanium Nitride Epitaxial Films as a Plasmonic Material Platform: Alternative to Gold

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 1848-1854

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00617

关键词

titanium nitride (TiN); gold (Au); plasmonic material; plasmonic metasurface; dielectric function; surface plasmon interferometry; molecular-beam epitaxy

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in Taiwan [MOS-108-2119-M-007-008, MOST-105-2112-M-007-011-MY3, MOST-107-2923-M-007-004-MY3, MOST-107-2119-M-002-006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium nitride (TiN) is an interesting refractory metallic compound which could replace gold as an alternative plasmonic material, especially for high temperature and semiconductor compatible applications. However, reported plasmonic properties of TiN films are so far limited by conventional growth techniques, such as reactive sputtering. In this work, we adopt the nitrogen-plasma-assisted molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) to grow single-crystalline, stoichiometric TiN films on sapphire substrates. The properties of as-grown TiN epitaxial films have been fully characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), spectroscopic ellipsometry (SE), and surface plasmon polariton (SPP) interferometry. We have confirmed that MBE-grown TiN films exhibit excellent plasmonic properties to replace gold in the visible and near-infrared spectral regions. Measuring the real and imaginary parts of dielectric function by SE, it is also found that TiN is better than gold in the short- wavelength range (<500 nm), where gold suffers from strong loss due to interband transition. Contrary to the recent theoretical prediction that air is not able to stabilize SPP modes at the TiN surface, our surface plasmon interferometry data clearly show the presence of propagating SPP modes at the TiN/air interface. To demonstrate the unique plasmonic properties of MBEgrown stoichiometric TiN, we have fabricated TiN metasurfaces for the visible-spectrum applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据