4.6 Article

Discussing and Analyzing Maritime Cohesion in MSP, to Achieve Sustainability in the Marine Realm

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su11123444

关键词

Maritime Spatial Planning; cohesion thinking; maritime cohesion; multi-use concept; resilience; sustainable development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whilst the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 promotes the conservation and sustainable use of the seas, oceans and marine resources for sustainable development, decisions in ecosystem-based Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) follow annoying and costly trade-offs and this may negatively impact its acceptance. To address conflicts and cumulative impacts and favor, as much as possible, interfering of marine activities, positive coordination and win-win options, it is necessary to develop integrated and cohesive planning approaches and new management tools. In this article, a conceptual framework of maritime cohesion is being developed mostly applicable to peopled and crowded seas and a set of relevant indicators to assess it, is proposed. It is based on the triple-model of interdependent components such as maritime spatial efficiency, maritime spatial quality and maritime spatial identity, taking into account the territorial cohesion equivalent, promoted by the Cohesion Policy. Then, in order to broadly analyze the spatial efficiency component, the multi-use concept and management tools, recently given particular emphasis by EU Blue Growth Strategy, are examined thoroughly, using the relevant literature. This article highlights constructive use of maritime cohesion with the multi-use MSP paradigm as key part of maritime cohesion narrative and posits that its huge and extensive potential can stimulate dynamic, collaborative, cohesive and assemblage thinking in the MSP process and be the spearhead to balance economic, social, environmental and cultural aspirations in maritime planning to achieve sustainability in the marine realm.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据