4.5 Review

HCN2 ion channels: basic science opens up possibilities for therapeutic intervention in neuropathic pain

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 473, 期 -, 页码 2717-2736

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20160287

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/J013129/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/J009180/1, BB/F009860/1, BB/J009180/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/J013129/2, MR/J013129/1, 1127872] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/J009180/2, BB/F009860/1, BB/J009180/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/J013129/2, MR/J013129/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nociception - the ability to detect painful stimuli - is an invaluable sense that warns against present or imminent damage. In patients with chronic pain, however, this warning signal persists in the absence of any genuine threat and affects all aspects of everyday life. Neuropathic pain, a form of chronic pain caused by damage to sensory nerves themselves, is dishearteningly refractory to drugs that may work in other types of pain and is a major unmet medical need begging for novel analgesics. Hyperpolarisation-activated cyclic nucleotide (HCN)-modulated ion channels are best known for their fundamental pacemaker role in the heart; here, we review data demonstrating that the HCN2 isoform acts in an analogous way as a 'pacemaker for pain', in that its activity in nociceptive neurons is critical for the maintenance of electrical activity and for the sensation of chronic pain in pathological pain states. Pharmacological block or genetic deletion of HCN2 in sensory neurons provides robust pain relief in a variety of animal models of inflammatory and neuropathic pain, without any effect on normal sensation of acute pain. We discuss the implications of these findings for our understanding of neuropathic pain pathogenesis, and we outline possible future opportunities for the development of efficacious and safe pharmacotherapies in a range of chronic pain syndromes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据