4.6 Article

Biodegradable Waste Frying Oil-Based Ethoxylated Esters as Highly Efficient Plasticizers for Poly(lactic acid)

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 7, 期 19, 页码 15957-15965

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02312

关键词

Poly(lactic acid); Waste frying oil; Vegetable oil-based plasticizer; Polyethylene glycol monomethyl ether

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program, China [2018YFD0600402]
  2. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University, China [163030767]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) is a green but brittle thermoplastic, and its flexibility must be improved to meet the requirements of application. In this work, a series of waste frying oil-derived esters including ethoxylated esters and methyl esters were developed and then used as plasticizers for PLA. The influences of ester groups on the miscibility, mechanical properties, volatility resistance, and biodegradation of plasticized PLA were systematically studied and contrasted with that of PLA blended with dioctyl terephthalate. Glass transition temperature and tensile properties indicated that the plasticizing efficiencies of waste frying oil-based ethoxylated esters were better than that of dioctyl terephthalate or waste frying oil-based methyl ester, and its plasticizing efficiencies were increased with increasing the ethyoxyl units. Biodegradability test results indicated that the biodegradation rate of waste frying oil-based ethoxylated ester was accelerated by ethyoxyl units. In particular, waste frying oil polyacid (2-(2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethanol) esters (WFOPA-3) owning maximum ethyoxyl units exhibited remarkable plasticization and biodegradable properties than those of other plasticizers. These results suggest that WOFOPA-3 can be used as a highly efficient and biodegradable plasticizer to replace petro-based dioctyl terephthalate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据