4.6 Article

Disruption of thermo-tolerant Desmodesmus sp F51 in high pressure homogenization as a prelude to carotenoids extraction

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 243-251

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.01.003

关键词

Microalgae; Desmodesmus sp.; Downstream processing; Cell disruption; Carotenoids; Modelling

资金

  1. National Marine Commonwealth Research Program of China [201205020-2]
  2. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [21336009]
  3. Taiwan's Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST104-3113-E-006-003]
  4. Special Foundation for Yong Scientists of Fuzhou University, China [XRC-1464]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six methods for microalgal cell disruption were compared for the optimization of carotenoids extraction from the lutein-rich thermo-tolerant microalga Desmodesmus sp. F51. Among them, both bead-beating and high pressure homogenization (HPH) were found to have potential to disrupt Desmodesmus sp. F51 cells with high efficiency, but this study focused only on HPH treatment. Effects of homogenization pressure, cycle number and cell density on cell disruption efficiency were investigated. The degree of cell disruption increased with increasing high homogenization pressure (10-40 kpsi) and cycle number (1-4). Cell density in the range of 2.0-90 g/L did not affect the performance of cell disruption process, while a higher specific energy consumption arised when using a lower cell concentration. The HPLC analysis showed that the main carotenoids present in Desmodesmus sp. F51 were neoxanthin, violaxanthin, lutein, alpha-carotene and beta-carotene. Moreover, the developed HPH model could well describe the cell disruption behavior at various high homogenization pressures (10-40 kpsi) and cycle numbers (1-4). The obtained parameters indicate that homogenization pressure is a more significant factor than cycle number in achieving high cell disruption efficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据