4.6 Article

Hybrid LEAP modeling method for long-term energy demand forecasting of regions with limited statistical data

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 26, 期 8, 页码 2136-2148

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-019-4161-0

关键词

energy demand forecasting with limited data; hybrid LEAP model; ARIMA model; Leslie matrix; Monte-Carlo method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51606225]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2016JJ2144]
  3. Graduate Independent Explorative Innovation Foundation of Central South University, China [502221703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An accurate long-term energy demand forecasting is essential for energy planning and policy making. However, due to the immature energy data collecting and statistical methods, the available data are usually limited in many regions. In this paper, on the basis of comprehensive literature review, we proposed a hybrid model based on the long-range alternative energy planning (LEAP) model to improve the accuracy of energy demand forecasting in these regions. By taking Hunan province, China as a typical case, the proposed hybrid model was applied to estimating the possible future energy demand and energy-saving potentials in different sectors. The structure of LEAP model was estimated by Sankey energy flow, and Leslie matrix and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models were used to predict the population, industrial structure and transportation turnover, respectively. Monte-Carlo method was employed to evaluate the uncertainty of forecasted results. The results showed that the hybrid model combined with scenario analysis provided a relatively accurate forecast for the long-term energy demand in regions with limited statistical data, and the average standard error of probabilistic distribution in 2030 energy demand was as low as 0.15. The prediction results could provide supportive references to identify energy-saving potentials and energy development pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据