4.6 Article

Imaging analysis of nuclear antiviral factors through direct detection of incoming adenovirus genome complexes

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.078

关键词

Adenovirus; Antiviral response; 1E116; PHF13/SPOC1; Intrinsic immunity; PML nuclear body

资金

  1. ANR [ANR 14 IFEC 0003-04]
  2. project eDEVILLI
  3. excellence initiative (IdEX) of the Bordeaux University
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-IFEC-0003] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies involving several viral systems have highlighted the importance of cellular intrinsic defense mechanisms through nuclear antiviral proteins that restrict viral propagation. These factors include among others components of PML nuclear bodies, the nuclear DNA sensor 1F116, and a potential restriction factor PHF13/SPOC1. For several nuclear replicating DNA viruses, it was shown that these factors sense and target viral genomes immediately upon nuclear import. In contrast to the anticipated view, we recently found that incoming adenoviral genomes are not targeted by PML nuclear bodies. Here we further explored cellular responses against adenoviral infection by focusing on specific conditions as well as additional nuclear antiviral factors. In line with our previous findings, we show that neither interferon treatment nor the use of specific isoforms of PML nuclear body components results in co-localization between incoming adenoviral genomes and the subnuclear domains. Furthermore, our imaging analyses indicated that neither IF116 nor PHF13/SPOC1 are likely to target incoming adenoviral genomes. Thus our findings suggest that incoming adenoviral genomes may be able to escape from a large repertoire of nuclear antiviral mechanisms, providing a rationale for the efficient initiation of lytic replication cycle. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据