4.3 Article

Residential Wood Combustion in Finland: PM2.5 Emissions and Health Impacts with and without Abatement Measures

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162920

关键词

residential wood combustion; population exposure; disease burden; mortality; morbidity; particulate matter; fine particle concentrations

资金

  1. Academy of Finland project BATMAN [285672]
  2. Academy of Finland project GLORIA [310373]
  3. Academy of Finland project NABCEA [296644]
  4. NordForsk, under the Nordic Programme on Health and Welfare project [75007]
  5. EU LIFE + project Index-Air [LIFE15 ENV/PT/000674]
  6. National Institute for Health and Welfare
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [285672, 310373, 296644, 310373, 296644, 285672] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to fine particles in ambient air has been estimated to be one of the leading environmental health risks in Finland. Residential wood combustion is the largest domestic source of fine particles, and there is increasing political interest in finding feasible measures to reduce those emissions. In this paper, we present the PM2.5 emissions from residential wood combustion in Finland, as well as the resulting concentrations. We used population-weighed concentrations in a 250 x 250 m grid as population exposure estimates, with which we calculated the disease burden of the emissions. Compared to a projected baseline scenario, we studied the effect of chosen reduction measures in several abatement scenarios. In 2015, the resulting annual average concentrations were between 0.5 and 2 mu g/m(3) in the proximity of most cities, and disease burden attributable to residential wood combustion was estimated to be 3400 disability-adjusted life years (DALY) and 200 deaths. Disease burden decreased by 8% in the 2030 baseline scenario and by an additional 63% in the maximum feasible reduction scenario. Informational campaigns and improvement of the sauna stove stock were assessed to be the most feasible abatement measures to be implemented in national air quality policies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据