4.6 Article

Identification of ACSL4 as a biomarker and contributor of ferroptosis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.08.124

关键词

ACSL; Ferroptosis; Lipid metabolism; Biomarker; Hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01GM115366, R01CA160417]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030308011]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province [20160519001JH]
  4. Innovation Team of Education Department of Jilin Province [2016020]
  5. Norman Bethune Program of Jilin University [2015334]
  6. American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant [RSG-16-014-01-CDD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ferroptosis, a recently identified form of non- apoptotic cell death, is involved in several physiological and pathological rocesses. Although lipid peroxidation plays a central role in triggering ferroptosis, the essential regulator of lipid metabolism in ferroptosis remains poorly defined. Here, we show that acylCoA synthetase long- chain family member 4 ( ACSL4) is required for ferroptotic cancer cell death. Compared with ferroptosis- sensitive cells (e.g., HepG2 and HL60), the expression of ACSL4 was remarkably downregulated in ferroptosis- resistant cells (e.g., LNCaP and K562). In contrast, the expression of other ACSLs, including ACSL1, ACSL3, ACSL5, and ACSL6, did not correlate with ferroptosis sensitivity. Moreover, knockdown of ACSL4 by specific shRNA inhibited erastin- induced ferroptosis in HepG2 and HL60 cells, whereas overexpression of ACSL4 by gene transfection restored sensitivity of LNCaP and K562 cells to erastin. Mechanically, ACSL4-mediated production of 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (5-HETE) contributed to ferroptosis. Pharmacological inhibition of 5-HETE production by zileuton limited ACSL4 overexpression-induced ferroptosis. Collectively, these results indicate that ACSL4 is not only a sensitive monitor of ferroptosis, but also an important contributor of ferroptosis. (c) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据