4.7 Article

In Vivo Retargeting of Poly(beta aminoester) (OM-PBAE) Nanoparticles is Influenced by Protein Corona

期刊

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
卷 8, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201900849

关键词

liver retargeting; OM-PBAE nanoparticles; protein corona; retinol

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de Espana [RTC-2015-3751-1, SAF2015-64927-C2-1-R, SAF2015-64927-C2-2-R, RTI2018-094734-B-C22]
  2. MINECO
  3. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) from Generalitat de Catalunya [SGR 2017 1559]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the main bottlenecks in the translation of nanomedicines from research to clinics is the difficulty in designing nanoparticles actively vectorized to the target tissue, a key parameter to ensure efficacy and safety. In this group, a library of poly(beta aminoester) polymers is developed, and it is demonstrated that adding specific combinations of terminal oligopeptides (OM-PBAE), in vitro transfection is cell selective. The current study aims to actively direct the nanoparticles to the liver by the addition of a targeting molecule. To achieve this objective, retinol, successfully attached to OM-PBAE, is selected as hepatic targeting moiety. It is demonstrated that organ biodistribution is tailored, achieving the desired liver accumulation. Regarding cell type transfection, antigen presenting cells in the liver are those showing the highest transfection. Thanks to proteomics studies, organ but not cellular biodistribution can be explained by the formation of differential protein coronas. Therefore, organ biodistribution is governed by differential protein corona formed when retinol is present, while cellular biodistribution is controlled by the end oligopeptides type. In summary, this work is a proof of concept that demonstrates the versatility of these OM-PBAE nanoparticles, in terms of the modification of the biodistribution of OM-PBAE nanoparticles adding active targeting moieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据