4.7 Article

Ultrathin Nanofiltration Membrane from Confined Polymerization within the Nanowire Network for High Efficiency Divalent Cation Removal

期刊

ACS MACRO LETTERS
卷 8, 期 10, 页码 1240-1246

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.9b00624

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar [51625306]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51603229, 21406258]
  3. Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21433012]
  4. Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese, Hong Kong and Macao Scholars [21728602]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Separation Membranes and Membrane Processes (Tianjin Polytechnic University) [M1-201801]
  6. CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membranes with high permeance and high rejection for di- and multivalent cation removal are highly desired for efficient brackish water and industrial water treatment. In this work, we report a facile strategy for constructing ultrathin nanofiltration (NF) membranes by in situ cross-linking of amine which is confined in a network film. The network made of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) serves as a framework for poly(ethylene imine) (PEI) to attach and stay, facilitating the formation of a polyamine (PA) layer with high quality and controlled thickness. Benefiting from the ultrathin thickness of the SWCNT network (similar to 31 nm), an active layer (similar to 34 nm thick) comes with a high permeance of 27 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) along with a high rejection of 97% to MgCl2, 2-5 times higher than the NF membranes with the same high rejection for MgCl2 reported so far. In addition, the SWCNT-interpenetrated PA structure endows the ultrathin NF membrane with good operational stability. This work demonstrates the capability to control the position, thickness, and even quality of the PA layer by using a confined framework and provides a feasible strategy for the fabrication of highly permeable ultrathin NF membranes with a reinforced active layer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据