An Affordable and Feasible Technique for Minimally Invasive Tubular Lumbar Discectomy

BACKGROUND: The benefits of minimally invasive spine surgery are attainable only if hospitals have the financial resources to acquire essential equipment. We present a surgical approach readily available to countries where unacceptably expensive materials are the main limitation for use of minimally invasive spine surgery. METHODS: This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent minimally invasive spine surgery using syringes as dilators and retractors for posterior lumbar approaches. Inclusion criteria were lumbar radicular/back pain, degenerative disc, spondylolysis, unilateral approach, and maximum of 2 affected spine levels. Demographic characteristics, affected radicular level, diagnosis, type and length of surgery, hospital length of stay, MacNab criteria, complications, and resumption of daily activities were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 30 patients, 17 (56.6%) presented with S1 radicular pain. Pain was mainly due to posterolateral hernia (70%; n = 21) requiring 1-level discectomy. In 6 patients (20%), discectomy and an interspinous process device were required. One patient (3.33%) underwent 2-level discectomy. All surgeries were performed using syringes as dilators and retractors. Maximum syringe diameter used was 2 cm (20-mL syringes) in 29 patients (96.6%) and 3 cm (60-mL syringe) in 1 patient. Average length of surgery was 1.5 hours, and average hospital stay was 1.8 days. Based on MacNab criteria, excellent, good, and fair outcomes were achieved in 25 patients (83%), 3 patients (10%), and 2 patients (6.7%). Complications were observed in 5 patients (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This is a safe and feasible technique with excellent results obtained at low cost and is becoming an attractive surgical option in developing countries.