4.0 Article

Establishment of an adult zebrafish model of retinal neurodegeneration induced by NMDA

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 1250-1261

出版社

IJO PRESS
DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2019.08.04

关键词

zebrafish; NMDA; administration method; retinal ganglion cell; glaucomatous animal model; resveratrol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271425, 81260148, 31400988, 81160144, 31171044]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20181ACG70010]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi [20151BBG70243, 20122BCB23007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To establish a model of retinal neurodegeneration induced by N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) in adult zebrafish. METHODS: We compared the effects of three different NMDA delivery methods on retinal neurodegeneration in adult zebrafish: immersion (I.M.), intravitreal injection (I.V.), and intraperitoneal injection (I.P.), and examined retinal pathology and degeneration by hematoxylin and eosin and TUNEL staining in the treated zebrafish. Effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 and the natural product resveratrol on NMDA-induced retinal neurodegeneration were also assessed. RESULTS: The thickened inner retina was seen in histology with 100 mu mol/L NMDA by I.M. administration. Significant apoptosis in the retinal ganglion cell layer and retinal thickness reduction occurred in 0.5 mol/L NMDA I.P. administration group. Seizure-like behavioral changes, but no retinal histological alteration occurred in 16 mg/kg NMDA I.P. administration group. Resveratrol and MK-801 prevented NMDA-induced retinal neurodegeneration in the zebrafish. CONCLUSION: Among the three drug administration methods, I.V. injection of NMDA is the most suitable for establishment of an acute retinal damage model in zebrafish. I.M. with NMDA is likely the best for use as a chronic retinal damage model. I.P. treatment with NMDA causes brain damage. Resveratrol and MK801 may be a clinically valuable treatment for retinal neurodegeneration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据