4.0 Article

Impact of feeding mode on neurodevelopmental outcome in infants and children with congenital heart disease

期刊

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 1207-1213

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/chd.12827

关键词

cardiac; congenital heart defect; developmental impairment; feeding mode; heart surgery; infants; neurodevelopmental outcome

资金

  1. Candys Foundation
  2. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet, Kobenhavns Universitet
  3. Jascha Fonden
  4. Elsass Fonden

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To investigate the impact of feeding mode on neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with congenital heart defects. Design A retrospective cohort study of 208 children with congenital heart disease (CHD), who had surgery from 1 January 2013 until 31 December 2016 at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, US. Settings University Hospital, Developmental Outcome Clinic. Outcomes measures Standardized cognitive scores were assessed with Capute Scales and motor development with Revised Gesell Developmental Schedules. We analyzed anthropometrics, mode of feeding, surgical complexity, syndrome, and gender as predictors of developmental outcomes at four time points: hospital discharge, and 6, 12, and 24 months of age. Results Mode of feeding is associated with neurodevelopmental outcome in children with CHD. Children on enteral feeding tubes had significantly lower developmental quotient (DQ) scores in cognition, communication, and motor function at 12 and 24 months compared to orally fed children. There were greater proportions of developmental delays (DQ < 70) in enteral tube fed children at the 6, 12, and 24 months visits. Further, there was a strong association between presence of enteral feeding tube, syndrome, and developmental outcome. Greater surgical complexity, weight gain and ethnicity were not associated with the developmental outcomes. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the presence of an enteral feeding tube following corrective congenital heart surgery are at increased risk of neurodevelopmental delays at 12 and 24 months.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据