4.8 Article

Construction of CoP/NiCoP Nanotadpoles Heterojunction Interface for Wide pH Hydrogen Evolution Electrocatalysis and Supercapacitor

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 9, 期 36, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201901213

关键词

CoP; NiCoP; heterojunction interface construction; hydrogen revolution electrocatalysis; nanocrystals synthesis; supercapacitors

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [19CX02008A]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M642726]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21471160, 21701002]
  4. Taishan Scholars Program of Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Constructing well defined nanostructures is promising but still challenging for high-efficiency catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and energy storage. Herein, utilizing the differences in surface energies between (111) facets of CoP and NiCoP, a novel CoP/NiCoP heterojunction is designed and synthesized with a nanotadpoles (NTs)-like morphology via a solid-state phase transformation strategy. By effective interface construction, the disorder in terms of electronic structure and coordination environment at the interface in CoP/NiCoP NTs is created, which leads to dramatically elevated HER performance within a wide pH range. Theoretical calculations prove that an optimized proton chemisorption and H2O dissociation are achieved by an optimized phosphide polymorph at the interface, accelerating the HER reaction. The CoP/NiCoP NTs are also proved to be excellent candidates for use in supercapacitors (SCs) with a high specific capacitance (1106.2 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) and good cycling stability (nearly 100% initial capacity retention after 1000 cycles). An asymmetric supercapacitor shows a high energy density (145 F g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) and good cycling stability (capacitance retention is 95% after 3200 cycles). This work provides new insights into the catalyst design for electrocatalytic and energy storage applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据